Blimey,
Holmesy has got steam coming out of people's ears!
The
debate about the name change has got views from both ends
of the spectrum and has certainly got City fans talking.
There
are plenty of pros and cons for changing...Below FFS tries
to sum some of them up and we've also published various e-mails
that we've received on the matter.
And
before anyone asks...no the damn poll aint rigged! The FFS
poll started on 0 as loads of people saw yesterday morning
and you can only vote once (in a fortnight we think) unless
you're very clever with cookies and stuff. What's the point
in rigging it? We've got no hidden agenda and won't lose any
sleep whatever we're called. Pink shorts would be a different
story...
Some
of the other polls on the web however are daft enough to let
you vote again and again, and they've been flooded today by
various yes / no campaign groups!
The
vote last night on all the sites was in favour of a change
with votes ranging from 60 - 80% in favour and most of the
e-mails to us were in favour. But today has seen a real shift
to a no vote and e-mails against the idea.
Is
it because people have had time to think about it and weigh
up the pros and cons? Or just the noes are slower at getting
their act together to e-mail and vote?!
The
thing that emerges from the debate though is you're an old
cynical bunch. And after the last decade at City who wouldn't
be?
Against
Fosse
|
For
Fosse
|
Backwards
looking & old fashioned sounding. |
New
start and line drawn under administration fiasco. Takes
into account our heritage. |
Other
fans will take piss about us being in the ditch/gutter
and Fosse Dross/ Toss |
They already take piss out of Fester Shitty and the crisp
bowl. |
Cost
a bomb to do new rebranding everywhere |
Make
a fortune out of new merchandise / marketing |
Should
be proud to be City |
City
is Man City. Fosse is Unique. |
Have
to change the words to songs |
Sing
new songs |
Chairman
detracting from real issues at club, bad timing for debate |
At
least he's opening a debate up to fans instead of imposing
stuff |
Stuart
Hall (it's a knock out) has been calling us Leicester Fosse
on the beeb on Saturday after the game all season...and he's
mad as a fish.
Here's
some of the e-mails we've had in ( all genuine cos cut and
pasting is easier than making em up). Keep 'em coming...
In
favour...
"Fantastic
News! The opening of the new stadium was soured somewhat by
the stupidity of the proposed Walkers Bowl. The idea of returning
to the original name shows that the new board has some idea
of what supporting a football team is all about - history,
tradition, 1884 and all that. I think it's a brilliant idea
and the tears are welling up just thinking about it!"
"Oh
yes, all for the change, new era, new ground, new name...not
a new manager though!"
"Yes
I do think changing the name back to Leicester Fosse is a
very good idea, and agree with the to be new chairman that
the name is commonly associated with Man City."
"A
truly excellent idea, all in favour from a Leicester born
faithful from University of East Anglia. We 'ate Delia and
Tractor Boys! And its Leicester Fosse FC!!"
"A
new name for a new start, why not? It'll be good to have our
own identity rather than the plain old "City" or "United",
"Town", "County", "Rovers" etc. We may have even more success
as well, how many teams have been successful with the name
"City" after them?"
"Firstly,
I'd like to say what a fantastic gesture this is by the new
consortium. I, like many fans agree that this shows a complete
understanding of the necessity of our part in this debacle,
getting this recognition makes everything worthwhile. It is
a charming gesture considering our feelings as a fanbase and
totally in contrast to the Blue shorts and Post-Horn Gallop
debates. A lack of consultation which felt like a lack of
respect. May I make myself clear, I would dearly love to change
the name. Making ourselves globally unique would be fantastic.
I've supported City for all my life and follow passionately
their fortunes. However, amidst the heady satisfaction of
saving our club from total ruin, I would like to ask Mr Holmes
whether he has spared a thought for the actual financial implications
of a total corporate re-brand."
which
leads us nicely into...
Against...
"No
- stay with City. Fosse is nostalgic and backward looking
and it will soon be a joke with other fans. Yes there are
other Citys but that's not the point - our identity is based
83 years of history not pre first world war days."
"Ridiculous
idea . A fosse is a ditch and they might well fall in it !
Do not agree that 'City ' means Manchester City to most people."
"Is
latin for ditch or gutter. Fantastic."
"Sorry
but I was born supporting Leicester City & I will die supporting
Leicester City. As a club name Fosse is an anachronism (if
you saw Sky sports news on thursday, they just took the p**s!).
I cannot understand how anyone who threw a wobbler over the
blue shorts / post horn gallop fiascos could even contemplate
it. I am getting really fed up of the constant stream of crap
/ laughable publicity we as a club seem to generate. I have
spoken to friends around the country who support other clubs
and they all thought it was some kind of joke! Merchandising
anyone?"
"Whilst
Fosse has traditional (nay, Roman) associations because of
Fosse Way, please note that "fosse" dervied from the Latin
"fossa", meaning "ditch" or "pit". This meaning survives in
the modern Italian ("fossa") and in other languages dervived
principally from Latin e.g. Spanish ("fosa") or French ("fosse").
Should the club ever make it back to European competition,
we would not wish to be made a laughing stock, least of all
in being thought of as "the pits". "
Tell us what you think about this in our FFS Fans
Forum.
|